Blog

Stand-alone financial modelling can destroy your company

by Rickard Wärnelid at November 16 2009

no comments »

Financial models are used for a number of reasons depending on the situation. All too often I see financial models being developed on the implicit assumption that they are to be used to analyse a project or transaction on a stand alone basis.

The analyst’s model vs. the reality of management

When taking a step back from the detailed view of an individual financial modeller or analyst it becomes clear that hardly any financial models are analysed on a pure stand-alone basis. In a vast majority of cases the output of a financial model will be rated against alternative projects, peer competitors or against alternative asset classes.

Rating one project/transaction vs peer comparison

When constructing a financial model for stand-alone analysis of one transaction it is a common argument that one can simply define key metrics as you see them fit. For example, if you only have pre-tax, real cashflows then it is a very simple solution of the analyst to present to management and pre-tax, real, IRR.

On a stand-alone basis, this doesn’t present any problems but when the IRR from the current project is benchmarked against peers or alternatives, then having a consistent definition is critical or management runs the risk of unknowingly pick the wrong projects or transactions to proceed with.

Create financial modelling standards and associated workbook templates

A very simple, yet effective, solution the problem stated above is to ensure that there are financial modelling standards in your organisation. Even something as simple as creating a standard template output sheet can make a huge difference for the consistency of outputs, and it will only take a good financial modeller a couple of hours to put together.

Suggested areas to focus on to ensure consistency (absolute minimum)

  • IRR (pre/post tax, real/nominal)
  • NPV (pre/post tax, real/nominal, calculation date)
  • Cashflows (real/nominal)
  • Assumptions (prices curves, CPI, expansion options, hedging, production, reserves, life of assets)

In short, the standard output sheet should include enough information to allow a reader to make an informed decision, and compare this to other transactions prepared in the same format.

Print this page

Comments

Submit comment

Search Blogs

Need a financial model audit?

Do you want to find our more about our financial model audit services??

Read more about Corality

Bloggers

Bing specialises in financial modelling in Excel and VBA and has a wealth of technical and analytica...

View their blogs

Graham specialises in advising both private and public sectors on the financial and commercial aspec...

View their blogs

Minh has extensive knowledge and experience in accounting and auditing within Australia and Vietnam ...

View their blogs

Peter is a UK qualified accountant with over 10 years experience and a strong background in financia...

View their blogs

Rickard has a wealth of project finance and financial modelling experience gained from a range of po...

View their blogs